From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:13:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279066421.2096.920.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilu4fi68DQpbzsKJrrAVUq_ZFbm2AVNvaPK7VKu@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 17:16 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
> <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Peter,
> >
> > perf doesn't work on my Nehalem EX machine.
> > 1) The 1st start of 'perf top' is ok;
> > 2) Kill the 1st perf and restart it. It doesn't work. No data is showed.
> >
> > I located below commit:
> > commit 1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Date: Fri Mar 26 14:08:44 2010 +0100
> >
> > perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
> >
> > workaround From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Date: Fri Mar 26 13:59:41 CET 2010
> >
> > Implement the workaround for Intel Errata AAK100 and AAP53.
> >
> > Also, remove the Core-i7 name for Nehalem events since there are
> > also Westmere based i7 chips.
> >
> >
> > If I comment out the workaround in function intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all,
> > perf could work.
> >
> > A quick glance shows:
> > wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x3);
> > should be:
> > wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x7);
> >
> >
> > I triggered sysrq to dump PMU registers and found the last bit of
> > global status register is 1. I added a status reset operation like below patch:
> >
> What do you call the last bit? bit0 or bit63?
Sorry for confusing you. It's bit0, mapping to PERFMON_EVENTSEL0.
>
> > --- linux-2.6.35-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 2010-07-14 09:38:11.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-2.6.35-rc5_fork/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 2010-07-14 14:41:42.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -505,8 +505,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all(int
> > wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 1, 0x4300B1);
> > wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 2, 0x4300B5);
> >
> > - wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x3);
> > + wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x7);
> > wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0x0);
> > + /*
> > + * Reset the last 3 bits of global status register in case
> > + * previous enabling causes overflows.
> > + */
>
> The workaround cannot cause on overflow because the associated counters
> won't count anything given their umask value is 0 (which does not correspond
> to anything for event 0xB1, event 0xB5 is undocumented). This is for the events
> described in table A.2. If NHM-EX has a different definition for 0xB1, 0xB5,
> then that's another story.
I found the status bit is set by triggering sysrq to dump PMU registers.
If I start perf by gdb, sometimes, perf could work. I found one processor's 1st status
register is equal to 0 while other processors' are 1. If just starting perf, all 1st
status registers are equal to 1.
>
>
> > + wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, 0x7);
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[i];
> >
> >
> >
> > However, it still doesn't work. Current right way is to comment out
> > the workaround.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-14 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-13 8:14 perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc Zhang, Yanmin
2010-07-13 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-14 0:49 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-07-14 8:15 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-07-13 15:16 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-07-14 0:13 ` Zhang, Yanmin [this message]
2010-07-14 0:36 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-07-14 2:22 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-08-03 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 15:48 ` Stephane Eranian
[not found] ` <1280886349.2125.32.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
[not found] ` <1280905701.1923.717.camel@laptop>
[not found] ` <1280990413.2125.50.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
[not found] ` <1281004361.1923.1750.camel@laptop>
2010-08-06 5:39 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-08-18 10:27 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround tip-bot for Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279066421.2096.920.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com \
--to=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox