From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Matthias Hopf <mhopf@suse.de>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Traverse video_device_list for backlight restoration
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:27:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280885249.1779.97.camel@rui> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100803101157.GA29721@suse.de>
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 18:11 +0800, Matthias Hopf wrote:
> A bit of background about this patch:
>
>
> acpi_video_bus_get_devices() explicitly calls acpi_video_device_enumerate()
> before acpi_video_bus_get_one_device(), which does acpi_video_device_bind().
>
> In _enumerate(), active_list[] is created, with .bind_info explicitly set to
> NULL, while the related .bind_info entry in video_device_list is set to the
> acpi_video_device ptr in _bind().
>
> The .bind_info is later used in acpi_video_resume() to re-set the backlight
> - but it's only evaluated on the active_list[], on which all .bind_info are
> NULL by construction.
why? .bind_info in active_list is initialized in acpi_video_device_bind.
> This results in backlight not being restored, if the
> BIOS doesn't do this by itself already.
>
>
> The patch resolves this by replacing the active_list[] traversal by a
> video_device_list traversal,
> but due to the nature of the issue I'm unsure
> whether the original issue isn't of more principal quality.
> I don't understand
> why the list is (partially) transformed into an array in the first place,
> especially as both the array *and* the list are used in the code...
>
no, the active_list is an array in fact, which equals
acpi_video_bus->attached_array. Maybe we need to change it to a more
proper name.
I'm still wondering why the patch works for you.
could you please attach the acpidump output of this laptop?
please rebuild your kernel with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y, and reboot with
kernel parameter "acpi.debug_layer=0x10 acpi.debug_level=0x400".
and attach the dmesg output after resume, both w/ and w/o the patch you
attached.
thanks,
rui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-03 10:05 [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Traverse video_device_list for backlight restoration Matthias Hopf
2010-08-03 10:11 ` Matthias Hopf
2010-08-04 1:27 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2010-08-04 11:00 ` Matthias Hopf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1280885249.1779.97.camel@rui \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mhopf@suse.de \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox