From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Salomon <dilinger@collabora.co.uk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 4 (olpc_battery)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:17:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281374272.7143.23.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100809093925.1ff3dc11.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:39 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:47:55 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:10:35 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As the merge window is open, please do not add 2.6.27 material to your
> > > linux-next included trees until after 2.6.36-rc1.
> > >
> > > Changes since 20100803:
> >
> >
> > drivers/power/olpc_battery.c:387: error: unknown field 'owner' specified in initializer
> > drivers/power/olpc_battery.c:387: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
> > drivers/power/olpc_battery.c:387: warning: (near initialization for 'olpc_bat_eeprom.attr')
> >
> >
> > The .owner field has been dropped from the attr struct.
>
>
> Build still fails in linux-next 20100809.
Anton, please pull from git://git.infradead.org/~dwmw2/battery-2.6.git
(or I can just push it, but I figured I'd ask first).
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-09 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 5:10 linux-next: Tree for August 4 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-04 16:47 ` linux-next: Tree for August 4 (olpc_battery) Randy Dunlap
2010-08-09 16:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-08-09 17:17 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2010-08-09 17:25 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-08-04 17:16 ` [PATCH -next] ceph: rbd depends on BLOCK Randy Dunlap
[not found] ` <20100804222350.GA2220@phenom.dumpdata.com>
2010-08-04 22:24 ` linux-next: Tree for August 4, add a new git tree please? Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-08-05 0:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-05 14:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-08-05 14:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1281374272.7143.23.camel@localhost \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=cbouatmailru@gmail.com \
--cc=dilinger@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox