linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ling.ma@intel.com
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	root <root@glibc-nhm.localdomain>, Ma Ling <ling.ma@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] [X86] Fix potential issue on memmove
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:20:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281565234-3096-1-git-send-email-ling.ma@intel.com> (raw)

From: root <root@glibc-nhm.localdomain>

memmove allow source and destination address to be overlap, 
but no limitation for memcpy. So memmove use forward or
backward copy mode to handle src > dest and dest > src cases respectively.
However memcpy has not address overlap, it may use any copy mode
theoretically. Our original memmove will call memcpy and assume
it must use forward copy mode, otherwise the system will crash,
it is potential issue. The patch avoid assumption, meanwhile
re-active patch id a1e5278e40f16a4611264f8da9e557c16cb6f6ed,
which will use forward/backward copy mode according to offset address.

Signed-off-by: Ma Ling <ling.ma@intel.com>
---
In this version we try to keep and optimize original memmove.

 arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c  |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c
index 5415a9d..be424df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c
@@ -25,19 +25,35 @@ void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
 	int d0, d1, d2;
 
 	if (dest < src) {
-		memcpy(dest, src, n);
+		if ((dest + n) < src)
+			 return memcpy(dest, src, n);
+		else
+			__asm__ __volatile__(
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsb\n\t"
+				: "=&c" (d0), "=&S" (d1), "=&D" (d2)
+				:"0" (n),
+				 "1" (src),
+				 "2" (dest)
+				:"memory");
+
 	} else {
-		__asm__ __volatile__(
-			"std\n\t"
-			"rep\n\t"
-			"movsb\n\t"
-			"cld"
-			: "=&c" (d0), "=&S" (d1), "=&D" (d2)
-			:"0" (n),
-			 "1" (n-1+src),
-			 "2" (n-1+dest)
-			:"memory");
+
+		if((src + count) < dest)
+			return memcpy(dest, src, count);
+		else
+			__asm__ __volatile__(
+				"std\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsb\n\t"
+				"cld"
+				: "=&c" (d0), "=&S" (d1), "=&D" (d2)
+				:"0" (n),
+				 "1" (n-1+src),
+				 "2" (n-1+dest)
+				:"memory");
 	}
+
 	return dest;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(memmove);
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c
index 0a33909..ecacc4b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.c
@@ -8,13 +8,49 @@
 #undef memmove
 void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count)
 {
+	unsigned long d0, d1, d2, d3;
 	if (dest < src) {
-		return memcpy(dest, src, count);
+		if ((dest + count) < src)
+			 return memcpy(dest, src, count);
+		else
+			__asm__ __volatile__(
+				"movq %0, %3\n\t"
+				"shr $3, %0\n\t"
+				"andq $7, %3\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsq\n\t"
+				"movq %3, %0\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsb"
+				: "=&c" (d0), "=&S" (d1), "=&D" (d2), "=r" (d3)
+				:"0" (count),
+				 "1" (src),
+				 "2" (dest)
+				:"memory");
 	} else {
-		char *p = dest + count;
-		const char *s = src + count;
-		while (count--)
-			*--p = *--s;
+		if((src + count) < dest)
+			return memcpy(dest, src, count);
+		else
+			__asm__ __volatile__(
+				"movq %0, %3\n\t"
+				"lea -8(%1, %0), %1\n\t"
+				"lea -8(%2, %0), %2\n\t"
+				"shr $3, %0\n\t"
+				"andq $7, %3\n\t"
+				"std\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsq\n\t"
+				"lea 7(%1), %1\n\t"
+				"lea 7(%2), %2\n\t"
+				"movq %3, %0\n\t"
+				"rep\n\t"
+				"movsb\n\t"
+				"cld"
+				: "=&c" (d0), "=&S" (d1), "=&D" (d2), "=r" (d3)
+				:"0" (count),
+				 "1" (src),
+				 "2" (dest)
+				:"memory");
 	}
 	return dest;
 }
-- 
1.6.5.2


             reply	other threads:[~2010-08-12  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-11 22:20 ling.ma [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-12  6:48 [PATCH V2] [X86] Fix potential issue on memmove Namhyung Kim
2010-08-12  6:52 ` Ma, Ling
2010-08-12 14:15   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-12 14:22     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1281565234-3096-1-git-send-email-ling.ma@intel.com \
    --to=ling.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=root@glibc-nhm.localdomain \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).