From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/5] [PATCH] sched: pass sched_domain_level to sched_power_savings_store
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:29:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281947397.1926.1012.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100812172622.349333778@de.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 19:25 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Pass the corresponding sched domain level to sched_power_savings_store instead
> of a yes/no flag which indicates if the level is SMT or MC.
> This is needed to easily extend the function so it can be used for a third
> level.
Ah, so the plan is to reduce the number of knobs, not create more.
Sysadmins really aren't interested in having a powersavings knob per
topology level.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 17:25 [PATCH/RFC 0/5] sched: add new 'book' scheduling domain Heiko Carstens
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/5] [PATCH] sched: merge cpu_to_core_group functions Heiko Carstens
2010-08-13 21:11 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-31 8:26 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/5] [PATCH] sched: pass sched_domain_level to sched_power_savings_store Heiko Carstens
2010-08-13 21:13 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-19 11:36 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-08-16 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-08-19 11:41 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-08-19 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 12:32 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/5] [PATCH] sched: add book scheduling domain Heiko Carstens
2010-08-13 21:22 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-16 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/5] [PATCH] topology/sysfs: provide book id and siblings attributes Heiko Carstens
2010-08-12 17:25 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/5] [PATCH] topology: add z196 cpu topology support Heiko Carstens
2010-08-19 12:22 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/5] sched: add new 'book' scheduling domain Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1281947397.1926.1012.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox