From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKLM <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] [Patch-next] ACPI, APEI, ERST Fix the wrong checking of Serialization Header's length
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:33:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282008836.2744.1490.camel@yhuang-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C69DDB5.6060103@np.css.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 08:54 +0800, Jin Dongming wrote:
> header_length in struct acpi_table_erst is not the length of struct
> acpi_table_erst, but the length of Serialization Header.
>
> In erst_check_table(), header_length is used for checking the length
> of struct acpi_table_erst. So I think it is wrong.
Why "think"? Do you have a machine with header_length set as you said?
> This patch fixed it and I confirmed it on x86_64 next-tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> include/acpi/actbl1.h | 14 +++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
> index 864dd46..28a5caf 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
> @@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static struct apei_exec_ins_type erst_ins_type[] = {
> static inline void erst_exec_ctx_init(struct apei_exec_context *ctx)
> {
> apei_exec_ctx_init(ctx, erst_ins_type, ARRAY_SIZE(erst_ins_type),
> - ERST_TAB_ENTRY(erst_tab), erst_tab->entries);
> + ERST_TAB_ENTRY(erst_tab),
> + erst_tab->seri_header.entries);
> }
>
> static int erst_get_erange(struct erst_erange *range)
> @@ -749,12 +750,14 @@ __setup("erst_disable", setup_erst_disable);
>
> static int erst_check_table(struct acpi_table_erst *erst_tab)
> {
> - if (erst_tab->header_length != sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst))
> + if (erst_tab->common_header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst))
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (erst_tab->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst))
> +
> + if (erst_tab->seri_header.length != sizeof(struct acpi_erst_header))
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (erst_tab->entries !=
> - (erst_tab->header.length - sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst)) /
> +
> + if (erst_tab->seri_header.entries !=
> + (erst_tab->common_header.length - sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst)) /
> sizeof(struct acpi_erst_entry))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/actbl1.h b/include/acpi/actbl1.h
> index c637b75..821f8ac 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/actbl1.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/actbl1.h
> @@ -283,13 +283,21 @@ enum acpi_einj_command_status {
> *
> ******************************************************************************/
>
> -struct acpi_table_erst {
> - struct acpi_table_header header; /* Common ACPI table header */
> - u32 header_length;
> +/* ERST Serialization Header */
> +
> +struct acpi_erst_header {
> + u32 length;
> u32 reserved;
> u32 entries;
> };
>
> +/* ERST Header */
> +
> +struct acpi_table_erst {
> + struct acpi_table_header common_header; /* Common ACPI table header */
> + struct acpi_erst_header seri_header; /* ERST Serialization Header */
> +};
I don't think it is necessary to change the header definition, and
seri_header is not a good name for me.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 0:54 [PATCH 1/4] [Patch-next] ACPI, APEI, ERST Fix the wrong checking of Serialization Header's length Jin Dongming
2010-08-17 1:33 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2010-08-17 2:14 ` Jin Dongming
2010-08-17 3:22 ` Huang Ying
2010-08-17 4:44 ` Jin Dongming
2010-08-18 5:34 ` Huang Ying
2010-08-18 8:35 ` Jin Dongming
2010-08-20 19:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-23 0:26 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282008836.2744.1490.camel@yhuang-dev \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).