From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755700Ab0HQDWs (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:22:48 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:53745 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750888Ab0HQDWq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:22:46 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,380,1278313200"; d="scan'208";a="648418179" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] [Patch-next] ACPI, APEI, ERST Fix the wrong checking of Serialization Header's length From: Huang Ying To: Jin Dongming Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Andi Kleen , Hidetoshi Seto , ACPI , LKLM In-Reply-To: <4C69F094.1040607@np.css.fujitsu.com> References: <4C69DDB5.6060103@np.css.fujitsu.com> <1282008836.2744.1490.camel@yhuang-dev> <4C69F094.1040607@np.css.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:22:24 +0800 Message-ID: <1282015344.2744.1500.camel@yhuang-dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 10:14 +0800, Jin Dongming wrote: > > I don't think it is necessary to change the header definition, and > > seri_header is not a good name for me. > Why I added this structure here is that I don't want to do following checking. > For example, > if (header_length != 0x0c) { > ... > } This can be: static int erst_check_table(struct acpi_table_erst *erst_tab) { - if (erst_tab->header_length != sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst)) + if (erst_tab->header_length != + (sizeof(struct acpi_table_erst) - sizeof(erst_tab->header))) like Yinghai has been done. Best Regards, Huang Ying