From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
stable-review@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:55:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282470917.11348.891.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282462386.11348.871.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2571 bytes --]
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 08:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 07:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 08:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't know that they are particularly good tests for this change but I
> > > > also ran allmodconfig kernel build and ltp on 2.6.35.3+fixes without
> > > > issue. Are there any good mlock heavy workloads?
> > >
> > > mlock itself isn't very interesting, I think more interesting is
> > > testing that the doubly linked list handles all the cases correctly.
> > > Something that splits mappings, unmaps partial ones etc etc. Running
> > > something like Electric Fence is probably a good idea.
> >
> > EF_DISABLE_BANNER=1 EF_ALLOW_MALLOC_0=1 LD_PRELOAD=libefence.so.0.0 make
> >
> > craps out pretty quickly with:
> >
> > CC init/main.o
> >
> > ElectricFence Exiting: mprotect() failed: Cannot allocate memory
> > make[1]: *** [init/main.o] Error 255
> > make: *** [init] Error 2
> >
> > but it does that with 2.6.35.3, 2.6.35.2, 2.6.35.1 and 2.6.35 too so it
> > doesn't seem to be breakage relating to any of the stack guard stuff
>
> I increased the vm.max_map_count sysctl and now things are rolling
> along. Will let you know how I get on.
So its slow and memory intensive as hell due to efence so my test box is
struggling[0] but it has compiled 270+ .o files successfully so I think
it's OK from that perspective. I think it'll be quite a while before I
can say its passed an allmodconfig under efence though.
In the meantime I notice you've committed the patches. Can we get them
queued up for stable backports at some point? I appreciate you might
want them to bake for a bit longer in 2.6.36-rc first.
Greg, we are talking about:
0e8e50e20c837eeec8323bba7dcd25fe5479194c mm: make stack guard page logic use vm_prev pointer
7798330ac8114c731cfab83e634c6ecedaa233d7 mm: make the mlock() stack guard page checks stricter
297c5eee372478fc32fec5fe8eed711eedb13f3d mm: make the vma list be doubly linked
Cheers,
Ian.
[0] It's a 4G x 4 core box which normally does -j16 builds with no swap.
Now a -j4 will send it deep into the 16G of swap I added this morning,
and even a -j3 is a bit tight. I knew efence was resource intensive but
this still surprised me.
--
Ian Campbell
Who does not love wine, women, and song,
Remains a fool his whole life long.
-- Johann Heinrich Voss
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-22 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-20 23:59 [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21 0:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-21 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21 11:56 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-21 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21 16:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-23 16:34 ` Tony Luck
2010-08-22 6:57 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-22 7:33 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-22 9:55 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2010-08-22 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-22 17:25 ` Greg KH
2010-08-22 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-22 19:04 ` Greg KH
2010-08-23 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 15:42 ` ijackson
2010-08-23 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 17:18 ` Ian Jackson
2010-08-23 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-23 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 17:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 18:43 ` Darren Hart
2010-08-23 18:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-23 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-23 19:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-24 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-24 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:03 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-23 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 18:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-25 8:28 ` [Stable-review] " Stefan Bader
2010-08-23 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282470917.11348.891.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox