public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
	stable-review@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:55:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282470917.11348.891.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282462386.11348.871.camel@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2571 bytes --]

On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 08:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 07:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 08:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't know that they are particularly good tests for this change but I
> > > > also ran allmodconfig kernel build and ltp on 2.6.35.3+fixes without
> > > > issue. Are there any good mlock heavy workloads?
> > > 
> > > mlock itself isn't very interesting, I think more interesting is
> > > testing that the doubly linked list handles all the cases correctly.
> > > Something that splits mappings, unmaps partial ones etc etc. Running
> > > something like Electric Fence is probably a good idea.
> > 
> > EF_DISABLE_BANNER=1 EF_ALLOW_MALLOC_0=1 LD_PRELOAD=libefence.so.0.0 make
> > 
> > craps out pretty quickly with:
> > 
> >           CC      init/main.o
> >         
> >         ElectricFence Exiting: mprotect() failed: Cannot allocate memory
> >         make[1]: *** [init/main.o] Error 255
> >         make: *** [init] Error 2
> > 
> > but it does that with 2.6.35.3, 2.6.35.2, 2.6.35.1 and 2.6.35 too so it
> > doesn't seem to be breakage relating to any of the stack guard stuff
> 
> I increased the vm.max_map_count sysctl and now things are rolling
> along. Will let you know how I get on.

So its slow and memory intensive as hell due to efence so my test box is
struggling[0] but it has compiled 270+ .o files successfully so I think
it's OK from that perspective. I think it'll be quite a while before I
can say its passed an allmodconfig under efence though.

In the meantime I notice you've committed the patches. Can we get them
queued up for stable backports at some point? I appreciate you might
want them to bake for a bit longer in 2.6.36-rc first.

Greg, we are talking about:
0e8e50e20c837eeec8323bba7dcd25fe5479194c mm: make stack guard page logic use vm_prev pointer
7798330ac8114c731cfab83e634c6ecedaa233d7 mm: make the mlock() stack guard page checks stricter
297c5eee372478fc32fec5fe8eed711eedb13f3d mm: make the vma list be doubly linked

Cheers,
Ian.

[0] It's a 4G x 4 core box which normally does -j16 builds with no swap.
Now a -j4 will send it deep into the 16G of swap I added this morning,
and even a -j3 is a bit tight. I knew efence was resource intensive but
this still surprised me.

-- 
Ian Campbell

Who does not love wine, women, and song,
Remains a fool his whole life long.
		-- Johann Heinrich Voss

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-22  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-20 23:59 [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21  0:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-21  0:54   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21 11:56 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-21 15:48   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21 16:08     ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-23 16:34       ` Tony Luck
2010-08-22  6:57     ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-22  7:33       ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-22  9:55         ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2010-08-22 16:43           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-22 17:25           ` Greg KH
2010-08-22 18:21             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-22 19:04               ` Greg KH
2010-08-23  9:22               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 15:42               ` ijackson
2010-08-23 16:25                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 17:18                   ` Ian Jackson
2010-08-23 17:34                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-23 17:53                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 17:59                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 18:43                         ` Darren Hart
2010-08-23 18:50                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-23 19:07                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:23                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-23 19:26                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:54                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-24  7:08                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-24  7:20                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:03                       ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-23 17:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 18:53                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-25  8:28             ` [Stable-review] " Stefan Bader
2010-08-23  9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1282470917.11348.891.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox