From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
stable-review@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:53:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282586021.2605.2106.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=+O8wKZV6XT5wGJbfZdgC9kxTxvtEZMD+M+pZn@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 10:34 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> It's also
> dubious as a way to pin particular pages in the page tables, because
> it's not necessarily something that the semantics guarantee
> (historically mlock just guarantees that they won't be swapped out,
> not that they will necessarily maintain some particular mapping).
Quite so, and esp. now that page migration gets used more with all that
memory compaction stuff that got merged.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-23 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-20 23:59 [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21 0:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-21 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21 11:56 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-21 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-21 16:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-23 16:34 ` Tony Luck
2010-08-22 6:57 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-22 7:33 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-22 9:55 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-22 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-22 17:25 ` Greg KH
2010-08-22 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-22 19:04 ` Greg KH
2010-08-23 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 15:42 ` ijackson
2010-08-23 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 17:18 ` Ian Jackson
2010-08-23 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-23 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-08-23 17:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 18:43 ` Darren Hart
2010-08-23 18:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-23 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-23 19:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-24 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-24 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 19:03 ` Ian Campbell
2010-08-23 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 18:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-25 8:28 ` [Stable-review] " Stefan Bader
2010-08-23 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282586021.2605.2106.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox