From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753460Ab0IBGxJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:53:09 -0400 Received: from www84.your-server.de ([213.133.104.84]:54207 "EHLO www84.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752080Ab0IBGxI (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 02:53:08 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add quick erase format option From: Stefani Seibold To: dedekind1@gmail.com Cc: David Woodhouse , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , Artem Bityutskiy , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "Enzinger, Robert (EXT-Other - DE/Munich)" In-Reply-To: <1283302043.2018.92.camel@brekeke> References: <1281342353-18180-1-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net> <1281343038.12908.25.camel@localhost> <1281343974.18398.13.camel@wall-e.seibold.net> <1281353344.2332.8.camel@brekeke> <1281362069.20181.16.camel@wall-e.seibold.net> <1283081435.2131.24.camel@brekeke> <1283236978.6083.28.camel@wall-e.seibold.net> <1283302043.2018.92.camel@brekeke> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:53:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1283410392.6920.36.camel@wall-e.seibold.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: stefani@seibold.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, den 01.09.2010, 03:47 +0300 schrieb Artem Bityutskiy: > Stefani, > > you have strong points, but I'm still not entirely convinced. > > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:42 +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote: > > > I would like to change the option name so that it would reflect the > > > exact use-case we are creating it for: wiped out flash. So I'd be > > > happier with something like --pristine-flash. > > > > "Pristine" is not a word which non native speaker have in its > > vocabulary. > > Agree, not very simple word, when I met it in JFFS2 sources, I looked it > up in the dictionary :-) > > Also, your use-case is new/virgin/pristine/whatever NOR chips, which are > guaranteed to be erased, and I wanted to use option name which reflects > your use-case. > > How about: > > --virgin > --factory > --brand-new > --all-erased > > Or :-) --do-not-use-me is the best. But more seriously i think we should it split it into two options. --all-erased and --check-erased. The first assumes that all PEB are erased, while the second do the check if the PEB is erased and if not it will be erased. So we can handle NAND's, which have a fast erase, and NOR's which are very slow. With this we are able to pick the best option for the manufacturing. - Stefani