From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756616Ab0IBWvn (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:51:43 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:60779 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753513Ab0IBWvm (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:51:42 -0400 Message-Id: <1283467901.11295.1393104403@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: bUaVtlNqhxn4PmFEF4K/tk1zc/4MYbArqg/mTU2ExtDz 1283467901 From: "Alexander van Heukelum" To: "Jan Beulich" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface References: <4C7FBAA80200007800013F67@vpn.id2.novell.com> Subject: Re: Resend: [PATCH] x86-64: adjust frame type at paranoid_exit: In-Reply-To: <4C7FBAA80200007800013F67@vpn.id2.novell.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:51:41 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:54 +0100, "Jan Beulich" wrote: > As this isn't an exception or interrupt entry point, it doesn't have > any of the hardware provide frame layouts active. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > --- > arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- linux-2.6.36-rc3/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S > +++ 2.6.36-rc3-x86_64-paranoid_exit-unwind/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S > @@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ paranoidzeroentry machine_check *machine > > /* ebx: no swapgs flag */ > ENTRY(paranoid_exit) > - INTR_FRAME > + DEFAULT_FRAME > DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE) > TRACE_IRQS_OFF > testl %ebx,%ebx /* swapgs needed? */ > Yes... Acked-by: Alexander van Heukelum