Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host kernel

Shirley Ma
2010-09-15T06:21:31Z

On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 07:12 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Yes, I agree this patch is useful for demo purposes:
> simple, and shows what kind of performance gains
> we can expect for TX.

Any other issue you can see in this patch beside vhost descriptors
update? Don't you think once I address vhost_add_used_and_signal update
issue, it is a simple and complete patch for macvtap TX zero copy?

Thanks
Shirley