From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754730Ab0IORAg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:00:36 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:41630 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752009Ab0IORAf (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:00:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host kernel From: Shirley Ma To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Avi Kivity , "Xin, Xiaohui" , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20100915153927.GA1065@redhat.com> References: <1284483745.13351.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100914182707.GB15549@redhat.com> <1284490143.13351.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100914190156.GA16037@redhat.com> <1284492983.13351.95.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100915051241.GA25340@redhat.com> <1284531675.24603.259.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100915101000.GB28016@redhat.com> <1284562354.2573.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100915150412.GA679@redhat.com> <20100915153927.GA1065@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:00:04 -0700 Message-ID: <1284570004.2573.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 17:39 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > In fact, I rechecked: both bridge and loopback have NETIF_F_HIGHDMA > set. > So maybe we should check NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL ... > > macvtap in bridged mode is interesting as well. I found that too, just wondered which flag to use is better. :) Thanks Shirley