From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755714Ab0IPRrY (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:47:24 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:33689 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755693Ab0IPRrT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:47:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Cross Memory Attach From: Peter Zijlstra To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Christopher Yeoh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20100915104855.41de3ebf@lilo> <1284654451.2275.579.camel@laptop> <1284657194.2275.585.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:47:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1284659227.2275.595.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:34 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Of course, these days I would seriously suggest against trying to > optimize the kmap() case. It only matters on crap hardware these days. > Anybody running HIGHMEM in 2010 and thinks that it makes sense > deserves the pain the get. We should not complicate the kernel further > for it, and sane architectures will have a no-op kmap(). OK, fully agreed. Someone ought to tell ARM though :-)