From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
"gorcunov@gmail.com" <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Lin, Ming M" <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
"yinghai@kernel.org" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"eranian@google.com" <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix duplicate calls of the nmi handler
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:13:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284682396.32373.16.camel@yhuang-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284658950.2275.591.camel@laptop>
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 01:42 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 17:56 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > The commit:
> >
> > e40b172 x86: Move notify_die from nmi.c to traps.c
> >
> > moved the nmi handler call to default_do_nmi(). DIE_NMI_IPI and
> > DIE_NMI are called subsequently now. If the return code is
> > !NOTIFY_STOP, then the handlers are called twice. This patch fixes
> > this.
>
> What is this NMI_IPI thing, and why do we bother?
>
> If the hardware reason thin can discriminate between IPI and other NMIs
> we should never call both chains, if it cannot, why do we have 2 chains?
>
> In any case, I don't think perf/oprofile/etc,. should use NMI_IPI, that
> doesn't really make sense.
>
> Or am I totally confused about things here?
Please take a look at my recent patch that rewrites the NMI handler.
Where NMI are divided into two types. CPU specific NMI are processed
firstly as DIE_NMI_IPI, and non-CPU specific NMI are processed as
DIE_NMI.
CPU specific NMIs include perf event, oprofile, crash, etc. They can be
processed on specific CPU only.
non-CPU specific NMIs include SERR and IOCHK NMI (via checking port
0x61) and APEI GHES NMI. They can be processed on any CPU.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-17 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-02 19:07 [PATCH 0/3 v2] nmi perf fixes Don Zickus
2010-09-02 19:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf, x86: Fix accidentally ack'ing a second event on intel perf counter Don Zickus
2010-09-02 19:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-02 20:00 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-02 20:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-03 7:10 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-09-03 7:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-03 15:00 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-03 17:15 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-03 18:35 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-03 19:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-03 20:10 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-04 23:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-10-11 20:25 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-02 19:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf, x86: Try to handle unknown nmis with an enabled PMU Don Zickus
2010-09-03 7:11 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2010-09-02 19:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values Don Zickus
2010-09-03 7:10 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 11:41 ` [PATCH 0/3 v2] nmi perf fixes Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 12:10 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10 12:13 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-10 13:27 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-10 14:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-10 15:17 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-10 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 16:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-10 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-10 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-10 16:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-10 15:56 ` [PATCH] x86: fix duplicate calls of the nmi handler Robert Richter
2010-09-10 16:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-11 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-11 11:44 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-11 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-12 9:52 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13 14:37 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-14 17:41 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-15 16:20 ` [PATCH] perf, x86: catch spurious interrupts after disabling counters Robert Richter
2010-09-15 16:36 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-15 17:00 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-15 17:32 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-15 18:44 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-15 19:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-15 20:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-15 20:39 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-15 22:27 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 14:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-15 16:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-15 16:47 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-15 17:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-15 17:28 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-15 17:40 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-15 22:10 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 6:53 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-16 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-17 8:51 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-17 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-17 13:06 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-20 8:41 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-24 0:02 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-24 3:18 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-24 10:03 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-24 13:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-30 12:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-24 18:11 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-24 10:41 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Catch " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2010-09-29 12:26 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 12:53 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 12:54 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 13:13 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 13:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 15:01 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 15:12 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 15:27 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-29 15:33 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 15:45 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-29 15:51 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-29 16:32 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 16:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-29 16:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 17:09 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 17:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-29 18:12 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-29 19:42 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 20:03 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-30 9:12 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-30 19:44 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-01 7:17 ` Robert Richter
[not found] ` <AANLkTimUyLaVaBigjm0-CwRsdh4UXWDiss2ffX53S+k_@mail.gmail.com>
2010-10-01 11:53 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-10-02 9:35 ` Robert Richter
2010-10-04 8:53 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-10-04 9:07 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-04 17:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 16:31 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 16:22 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 19:01 ` Don Zickus
2010-09-29 13:39 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-29 13:56 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 14:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-10-02 9:50 ` Robert Richter
2010-10-02 17:40 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-29 15:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-16 17:42 ` [PATCH] x86: fix duplicate calls of the nmi handler Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-16 20:18 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-17 7:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-17 0:13 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2010-09-17 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-17 8:13 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-17 8:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-17 8:47 ` Huang Ying
2010-09-10 13:34 ` [PATCH 0/3 v2] nmi perf fixes Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-10 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-13 8:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-13 9:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-13 10:07 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-09-13 10:10 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-09-13 10:12 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284682396.32373.16.camel@yhuang-dev \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).