From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] FireWire fixes
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 02:00:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284768009.2741.3.camel@maxim-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C93FCC7.9040406@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 01:41 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Running new stack on the laptop + old stack on the desktop gave me about
> > 18-30 Mbit/s speeds varying all the time.
> > Running both with the new stack results in corrupted packets and sftp
> > exits immediately.
>
> firewire-net, the IP over 1394 driver, is still marked as experimental not
> because somebody forgot to remove that mark but because we mean it. But so is
> its older counterpart, eth1394. Both eth1394 and firewire-net are chronically
> underused and undermaintained.
I sure do understand it!
I just did another round of testing and report the results.
Do you have an idea what could cause such low speeds?
>
> > The problems I so hoped to be fixed in new stack still persist:
> >
> > Cable disconection/reconnection still results in the link loss till
> > ifconfig down/up.
> >
> > Suspend/resume also results in the link loss.
>
> Sounds like something that shouldn't be too hard to fix by anybody who can
> spare the time. Surely a higher-level problem somewhere in firewire-net.
>
> > Driver still has panics on some occasions.
>
> At the moment I suspect that this OTOH might not be a firewire-net problem but
> possibly a race in firewire-ohci which is only triggered by workload as
> firewire-net imposes it (heavy AT context usage).
Thanks for information!
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-17 12:47 [git pull] FireWire fixes Stefan Richter
2010-09-17 23:06 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-09-17 23:41 ` Stefan Richter
2010-09-18 0:00 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2010-09-18 0:00 ` Peter Stuge
2010-09-18 0:02 ` Maxim Levitsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-05 16:17 Stefan Richter
2014-05-30 13:41 Stefan Richter
2014-03-08 9:37 Stefan Richter
2011-08-15 14:01 Stefan Richter
2010-11-28 13:07 Stefan Richter
2010-11-05 20:04 Stefan Richter
2010-08-29 9:54 Stefan Richter
2010-03-02 18:45 [git pull] FireWire updates post 2.6.33 Stefan Richter
2010-03-26 13:05 ` [git pull] FireWire fixes Stefan Richter
2010-04-15 15:59 ` [git pull] FireWire fixes and documentation update Stefan Richter
2010-04-22 19:45 ` [git pull] FireWire fixes Stefan Richter
2009-12-06 17:56 [git pull] FireWire updates post 2.6.32 Stefan Richter
2009-12-11 20:59 ` [git pull] FireWire fix Stefan Richter
2009-12-31 18:55 ` [git pull] FireWire fixes; new firewire stack is recommended to distributors and users Stefan Richter
2010-01-28 17:05 ` [git pull] FireWire fixes Stefan Richter
2010-02-15 22:19 ` Stefan Richter
2009-11-28 0:50 Stefan Richter
2009-09-05 15:18 Stefan Richter
2007-08-25 16:24 [GIT PULL] " Stefan Richter
2007-08-02 18:52 Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284768009.2741.3.camel@maxim-laptop \
--to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox