From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751973Ab0ISHRz (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 03:17:55 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:46361 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751103Ab0ISHRy (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 03:17:54 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=VrEsbBYN/6sG3aqWdgMALCnef3RjGlT8v+bgzbpmgtdr+4mg0koFj52Ix6LhsTe1fa 9twbN6PBZpzbbRz0LJmSz/N5KyW6KVZRgzRBcVAJLwOJC5C6W8tuT+3F+e800kI4NVkf dgtDV5F7ZGucG6GAYxIyJbDJp6ydDtE289NQc= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: nand: Expand nand_ecc_layout, deprecate ioctl ECCGETLAYOUT From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Brian Norris Cc: Shinya Kuribayashi , David Woodhouse , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Sneha Narnakaje , Linux Kernel , Kevin Cernekee In-Reply-To: <4C951B2A.1000706@gmail.com> References: <4C5CA4A1.1040000@broadcom.com> <1282154806-9420-1-git-send-email-norris@broadcom.com> <4C6DD170.1060807@renesas.com> <4C6E9C23.6060703@broadcom.com> <1282646703.24044.162.camel@localhost> <4C746DE0.7000104@gmail.com> <1283163647.12995.43.camel@brekeke> <1284830690.1721.3.camel@brekeke> <4C951B2A.1000706@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:17:50 +0300 Message-ID: <1284880670.1721.111.camel@brekeke> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 (2.30.2-4.fc13) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 13:03 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > On 9/18/2010 10:24 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Brian, > > > > would you address the small things I noticed in a follow-up patch? > > Artem, > > Yes, I will. I'm sorry for the delay; I've been a little busy and > putting some things off. Would you like a patch for the comments against > your l2 tree or try and squash it with my previous commit and base it > off of mtd-2.6 or some other option? No, against l2 tree is ok, I'll put it on top, thanks! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)