public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, T Dent <tdent48227@gmail.com>,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, dmonakhov@openvz.org,
	sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:29:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285468192.6115.131.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100926021030.GJ19690@thunk.org>

On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 22:10 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 07:03:11PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > When you define "it" that way, not as any simple
> > file pattern match, but as a control for what
> > 	"git log -- path"
> > to inspect,  it's quite feasible to use the pattern
> > match rather than the file name.
> > So, thanks, that's a good suggestion.
> Don't make it an option, though.  If you must use hueristics, then at
> least *try* to make the hueristics smarter.  If the file name falls
> into certain patterns, such as:
>      fs/*/*.[ch]
>      drivers/scsi/*/*.[ch]
>      drivers/net/*/*.[ch]
> etc., then you really should be doing the analysis by subdirectory,
> and not by file.
 
I think if there's an exact pattern "depth" match, then
git history should be searched by that subdirectory.

So for example:
	F:	drivers/scsi/megaraid/

A lookup for drivers/scsi/megaraid/mega_common.h (same depth,
search all commits in drivers/scsi/megaraid) now shows:

$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/scsi/megaraid/mega_common.h  --rolestats --git
Neela Syam Kolli <megaraidlinux@lsi.com> (maintainer:MEGARAID SCSI DRI...)
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@suse.de> (maintainer:SCSI SUBSYSTEM,commit_signer:20/27=74%)
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org (open list:MEGARAID SCSI DRI...)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)

> But what was shipped as part of 2.6.35 was really, really, *REALLY*
> bad.  It makes me wonder how much testing someone did with the
> hueristics before turning it loose for the newbies to use.
 
A fair bit with all public discussions.

It's been shipped more or less that way since 2.6.30
beginning in April, 2009.

I get annoyed when people suggest that the maintainer
of that silly script isn't responsive.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-26  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-25 18:31 [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue Tracey Dent
2010-09-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] Fs: ext4: acl.h: whitespace cleanup Tracey Dent
2010-09-26  6:11   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-09-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 03/10] Fs: ext: balloc: fixed a few issues that checkpatch.pl was having Tracey Dent
2010-09-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 04/10] Fs: ext4: block_validity: added space around = sign Tracey Dent
2010-09-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 05/10] Fs: ext4: ext4: cleaned up the file with checkpatch.pl Tracey Dent
2010-09-26  6:23   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-09-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 06/10] Fs: ext4: extents: whitespace cleanup Tracey Dent
2010-09-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 07/10] Fs: ext4: file: fixed indent problem Tracey Dent
2010-09-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 08/10] Fs: ext4: ioctl: fixed spacing issue Tracey Dent
2010-09-25 18:32 ` [PATCH 09/10] Fs: ext4: mballoc.c: whitespace cleanup Tracey Dent
2010-09-25 18:32 ` [PATCH 10/10] Fs: ext4: namei: fixed file of checkpatch/pl warnings and errors Tracey Dent
2010-09-26  6:36   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-09-26 18:23     ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-26 18:35       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2010-09-26 19:17       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-09-25 23:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-25 23:53   ` T Dent
2010-09-25 23:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26  0:01       ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-26  0:09         ` Joe Perches
2010-09-26  0:32           ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-26  0:36             ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-26  0:50             ` Joe Perches
2010-09-26  0:58               ` Joe Perches
2010-09-26  6:42                 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-09-26  6:49                   ` Joe Perches
2010-09-26 11:31                     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-09-26  1:04               ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-26  1:32                 ` Joe Perches
2010-09-26  1:53                   ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-26  2:03                     ` Joe Perches
2010-09-26  2:10                       ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-26  2:21                         ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-26  2:45                           ` Joe Perches
2010-09-26  2:29                         ` Joe Perches [this message]
2010-09-26  0:06       ` Joe Perches
2010-09-26 20:06         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-26 22:17           ` Joe Perches
2010-09-25 23:54 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-27 13:52   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1285468192.6115.131.camel@Joe-Laptop \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tdent48227@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox