From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759476Ab0I1HHn (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:07:43 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:34374 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754294Ab0I1HHl (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:07:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=diaRXS7YPCrkpU0gng+FlRDdOyWRecOLpsTtmHaCSZMuoKeyiNX2MDrrSQEyccQwPn r4q7TqCh3qFJrJ4kQ6OULRI0F/G/SYYp8ZNPik0T5HU4RiuoViR4xLJXQDNwTAPLc8Au fc28aSQyDN5rYAwL6R0ciRfoQ7BLzjsmcLwQg= Subject: Re: Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Chris Mason Cc: Jan Kara , Cesar Eduardo Barros , Andrew Morton , hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Jens Axboe , =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Piotrowski , Chuck Ebbert , kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org In-Reply-To: <20100927225452.GG4270@think> References: <4C9AA546.6050201@cesarb.net> <20100923123849.8975fe47.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100927222548.GG3610@quack.suse.cz> <20100927225452.GG4270@think> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:05:49 +0300 Message-ID: <1285657549.2437.28.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 (2.30.3-1.fc13) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 18:54 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:25:48AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > [Added CCs for similar ecryptfs warning] > > On Thu 23-09-10 12:38:49, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > This started appearing for me on v2.6.36-rc5-49-gc79bd89; it did not > > > > happen on v2.6.36-rc5-33-g1ce1e41, probably because it does not have > > > > commit 692ebd17c2905313fff3c504c249c6a0faad16ec which introduces the > > > > warning. > > > > [...] > > > > device fsid 44d595920ddedfa-3ece6b56e80f689e devid 1 transid 22342 > > > > /dev/mapper/vg_cesarbinspiro-lv_home > > > > SELinux: initialized (dev dm-3, type btrfs), uses xattr > > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > > WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:87 inode_to_bdi+0x62/0x6d() > > > > Hardware name: Inspiron N4010 > > > > Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs > > > > Modules linked in: ipv6 kvm_intel kvm uinput arc4 ecb > > > > snd_hda_codec_intelhdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek iwlagn snd_hda_intel > > > > iwlcore snd_hda_codec uvcvideo snd_hwdep mac80211 videodev snd_seq > > > > snd_seq_device v4l1_compat snd_pcm atl1c v4l2_compat_ioctl32 btusb > > > > cfg80211 snd_timer i2c_i801 bluetooth iTCO_wdt dell_wmi dell_laptop snd > > > > pcspkr wmi dcdbas shpchp iTCO_vendor_support soundcore snd_page_alloc > > > > rfkill joydev microcode btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c cryptd aes_x86_64 > > > > aes_generic xts gf128mul dm_crypt usb_storage i915 drm_kms_helper drm > > > > i2c_algo_bit i2c_core video output [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > > > > Pid: 1073, comm: find Not tainted 2.6.36-rc5+ #8 > > > > Call Trace: > > > > [] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0x9d > > > > [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48 > > > > [] inode_to_bdi+0x62/0x6d > > > > [] __mark_inode_dirty+0xd0/0x177 > > > > [] touch_atime+0x107/0x12a > > > > [] ? filldir+0x0/0xd0 > > > > [] vfs_readdir+0x8d/0xb4 > > > > [] sys_getdents+0x81/0xd1 > > > > [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > Thanks for the report. These bdi pointers are a mess. As Chris pointed > > out, btrfs forgets to properly initialize inode->i_mapping.backing_dev_info > > for directories and special inodes and thus these were previously attached > > to default_backing_dev_info which probably isn't what Chris would like to > > see. > > There's no actual writeback for these, so it works fine for btrfs either > way. Side note: every time inode is marked as dirty, we wake up a bdi thread or the default bdi thread. So if we have inodes which do not need write-back, we should never mark them as dirty. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)