From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753948Ab0ETQau (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 12:30:50 -0400 Received: from n3-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.23.156]:30146 "HELO n3-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751385Ab0ETQat (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 12:30:49 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 246322.63922.bm@omp131.mail.gq1.yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=khRYmKtUUFCe2h1ts7Z05Z9yS9Ibl1PU5aRo295gATZHEWhHFDmvSTHiRzKHwWXbExcN5yQimiaLvtza1vC9A53Di56RBQ/+BVsgVs5EzBlTyxNf8MIV2YvNKzFu+iGyMfV1kE2Puonk14nm88m2HbR3miyhCTgHOtBv6VDRlS8=; Message-ID: <128576.2944.qm@web180315.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: aeNpfjYVM1lRrQSBVrpDq.n.htHmkdeMTalVopMHO0pwUT_ 5Nlm1yBeOP1CrlRol_sp5.MDvHT8.f6OWiyPHC4lOYu5nZKdswNMducZWFJm SSVL5pzI9VdU3A3nu5S_wVVZ7fP9jMzAFYsyC.7Zz9EOZIZz_EALLIBGrdge FIN0_B_7W5krFyt1q9iuddHttqQzedF7cjHxzcz285ENC7CbT5ncukTrgbfG hmAFpKpqXM7i.5AhKUZpDAhzZ6T.MLEkTXfBXkvMsrwa4m2h_YU2xSwPAm90 ogwIJm40VVAOgvUNjdw-- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680 Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT) From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] USB: gadget: g_multi: more configurable To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Michal Nazarewicz Cc: David Brownell , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <2460ac80ee51e759c7d4d552112c2e816db7c83b.1274187425.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Added Kconfig options for each > function used by g_multi so that > one can customize the gadget to a greater extend. Note that g_multi was intended to be a a fairly simple example, so another reason I don't like seeing all those config options is that it would no longer be a simple example .... I see you did a bunch of good work on MS-Windows interop (yay!), but that can be done without complexifying this driver. Let some other (new) driver take that role of "complex example"), but keep the simple one so there's an easy approach to the easy concepts.