RE: [PATCH 1/2] drivers:bluetooth: TI_ST bluetooth driver

Savoy, Pavan
2010-10-08T14:54:55Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcel Holtmann [mailto:marcel@holtmann.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 3:38 AM
> To: Gustavo F. Padovan
> Cc: Savoy, Pavan; linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org; greg@kroah.com; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers:bluetooth: TI_ST bluetooth driver
>
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> > Change the commit subject to "Bluetooth: TI_ST bluetooth driver"
> >
> > * pavan_savoy@ti.com <pavan_savoy@ti.com> [2010-10-07 14:47:16 -0400]:
> >
> > > From: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@ti.com>
> > >
> > > This is the bluetooth protocol driver for the TI WiLink7 chipsets.
> > > Texas Instrument's WiLink chipsets combine wireless technologies
> > > like BT, FM, GPS and WLAN onto a single chip.
> > >
> > > This Bluetooth driver works on top of the TI_ST shared transport
> > > line discipline driver which also allows other drivers like
> > > FM V4L2 and GPS character driver to make use of the same UART interface.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/bluetooth/bt_ti.c | 489
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 files changed, 489 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/bluetooth/bt_ti.c
> >
> > We don't have filename with bt_.. in drivers/bluetooth/. Maybe ti_st.c
> > should be a better name, or something like that.
>
> actually we have the bt prefix for company generic ones where they
> didn't wanna use the hardware name.
>
> So I prefer to use the hardware for a driver since it is much more clear
> that way. You acronym naming here is bad. It is confusing like hell.
>
> What about just calling this btwilink.c or something. I just spinning
> ideas here.

Ok, I like btwilink.c too. Does bt_wilink.c sound OK?
I have sent a patch with ti_st.c as of now.

Please review, and provide comments. I will incorporate comments and change
Name in the next version of the patch.

Thanks,
Pavan

> Regards
>
> Marcel
>