From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 3/6] x86, NMI, Rewrite NMI handler
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:13:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286813635.2336.617.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286606987-19879-3-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com>
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 14:49 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> notify_die(DIE_NMI_IPI);
> notify_die(DIE_NMI);
> /* process io port 0x61 */
> nmi_watchdog_touch();
> unknown_nmi();
Why keep NMI_IPI? What the heck is it for?
I'd like to see:
DIE_NMI
DIE_NMI_UNKNOWN
In DIE_NMI we walk the chain and deal with NMIs, in DIE_NMI_UNKNOWN we
try to consume extra NMIs where possible (like the much discussed extra
PMU interrupts).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-09 6:49 [PATCH -v3 1/6] x86, NMI, Add NMI symbol constants and rename memory parity to PCI SERR Huang Ying
2010-10-09 6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 2/6] x86, NMI, Add touch_nmi_watchdog to io_check_error delay Huang Ying
2010-10-09 6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 3/6] x86, NMI, Rewrite NMI handler Huang Ying
2010-10-11 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-10-11 20:35 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-12 0:50 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12 6:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12 6:14 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12 6:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12 6:37 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12 6:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12 6:45 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12 6:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12 6:54 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12 13:51 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-12 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 16:45 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-27 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 18:07 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-02 17:50 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-02 18:16 ` Huang Ying
2010-11-02 19:11 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-02 20:47 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-09 6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 4/6] Make NMI reason io port (0x61) can be processed on any CPU Huang Ying
2010-10-09 6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 5/6] x86, NMI, treat unknown NMI as hardware error Huang Ying
2010-10-10 14:07 ` Alan Cox
2010-10-10 14:13 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-11 21:08 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-11 21:12 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-11 21:20 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-12 1:10 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-20 6:12 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-20 14:15 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21 1:14 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-21 2:31 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21 5:17 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-21 14:10 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-22 1:49 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-22 2:05 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-22 2:56 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-22 5:23 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-22 9:24 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-09 6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 6/6] x86, NMI, Remove do_nmi_callback logic Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286813635.2336.617.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox