public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 3/6] x86, NMI, Rewrite NMI handler
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:04:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286863479.2336.1451.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286844650.7768.137.camel@yhuang-dev>

On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 08:50 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 00:13 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 14:49 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > notify_die(DIE_NMI_IPI);
> > > notify_die(DIE_NMI);
> > > /* process io port 0x61 */
> > > nmi_watchdog_touch();
> > > unknown_nmi(); 
> > 
> > Why keep NMI_IPI? What the heck is it for?
> 
> DIE_NMI_IPI is used for CPU-specific or CPU-local NMIs, such as perf
> NMI. While DIE_NMI is used for non-CPU-specific or global NMIs, such as
> NMI notification from source bridge.
> 
> The order between these two is important. So we use two die value to
> enforce the order.

But you can't know about that, there is no reason field to distinguish
between these cases, so you might as well fold it into a single notifier
chain and be done with it.

There is no good reason to call two chains when one is enough.

Also, the IPI name is terrible, its not IPI related at all. Please kill
the thing.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-12  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-09  6:49 [PATCH -v3 1/6] x86, NMI, Add NMI symbol constants and rename memory parity to PCI SERR Huang Ying
2010-10-09  6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 2/6] x86, NMI, Add touch_nmi_watchdog to io_check_error delay Huang Ying
2010-10-09  6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 3/6] x86, NMI, Rewrite NMI handler Huang Ying
2010-10-11 16:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-11 20:35     ` Don Zickus
2010-10-12  0:50     ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12  6:04       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-10-12  6:14         ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12  6:31           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12  6:37             ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12  6:40               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12  6:45                 ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12  6:49                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-12  6:54                     ` Huang Ying
2010-10-12 13:51                     ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-12 14:15                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 16:45                         ` Don Zickus
2010-10-27 17:08                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 18:07                             ` Don Zickus
2010-11-02 17:50                             ` Don Zickus
2010-11-02 18:16                               ` Huang Ying
2010-11-02 19:11                                 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-02 20:47                                 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-09  6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 4/6] Make NMI reason io port (0x61) can be processed on any CPU Huang Ying
2010-10-09  6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 5/6] x86, NMI, treat unknown NMI as hardware error Huang Ying
2010-10-10 14:07   ` Alan Cox
2010-10-10 14:13     ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-11 21:08       ` Don Zickus
2010-10-11 21:12         ` Don Zickus
2010-10-11 21:20   ` Don Zickus
2010-10-12  1:10     ` Huang Ying
2010-10-20  6:12     ` Huang Ying
2010-10-20 14:15       ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21  1:14         ` Huang Ying
2010-10-21  2:31           ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21  5:17             ` Huang Ying
2010-10-21 14:10               ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21 15:45                 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-22  1:49                   ` Don Zickus
2010-10-22  2:05                     ` Huang Ying
2010-10-22  2:56                       ` Don Zickus
2010-10-22  5:23                         ` Huang Ying
2010-10-22  9:24                     ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-09  6:49 ` [PATCH -v3 6/6] x86, NMI, Remove do_nmi_callback logic Huang Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1286863479.2336.1451.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox