From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755111Ab0JNJCE (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:02:04 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:39416 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755095Ab0JNJCC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:02:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage From: Peter Zijlstra To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dhaval Giani , Balbir Singh , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Kamalesh Babulal , Ingo Molnar , Pavel Emelyanov , Herbert Poetzl , Avi Kivity , Chris Friesen , Paul Menage , Mike Waychison , Paul Turner , Nikhil Rao In-Reply-To: <20101012075109.GC9893@in.ibm.com> References: <20101012074910.GA9893@in.ibm.com> <20101012075109.GC9893@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:01:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1287046900.29097.161.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 13:21 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > +static void account_cfs_rq_quota(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, > + unsigned long delta_exec) > +{ > + if (cfs_rq->quota_assigned == RUNTIME_INF) > + return; > + > + cfs_rq->quota_used += delta_exec; > + > + if (cfs_rq->quota_used < cfs_rq->quota_assigned) > + return; > + > + cfs_rq->quota_assigned += tg_request_cfs_quota(cfs_rq->tg); > +} That looks iffy, quota_assigned is only ever incremented and can wrap. Why not subtract delta_exec and replenish when <0? That keeps the numbers small.