From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
Cc: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
tmhikaru@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Subject: Re: High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:26:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287595605.3488.52.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287584073.3488.22.camel@twins>
OK, how does this work for people? I find my idle load is still a tad
high, but maybe I'm not patient enough.
---
include/linux/sched.h | 8 ++++++++
kernel/sched.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/sched_idletask.c | 1 -
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 ++
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 0383601..5311ef4 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -145,6 +145,14 @@ extern unsigned long this_cpu_load(void);
extern void calc_global_load(void);
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
+extern void calc_load_account_idle(void);
+extern void calc_load_account_nonidle(void);
+#else
+static inline void calc_load_account_idle(void) { }
+static inline void calc_load_account_nonidle(void) { }
+#endif
+
extern unsigned long get_parent_ip(unsigned long addr);
struct seq_file;
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index abf8440..f214222 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -526,6 +526,10 @@ struct rq {
/* calc_load related fields */
unsigned long calc_load_update;
long calc_load_active;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
+ long calc_load_inactive;
+ int calc_load_seq;
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1833,7 +1837,6 @@ static void cfs_rq_set_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long shares)
}
#endif
-static void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq);
static void update_sysctl(void);
static int get_update_sysctl_factor(void);
static void update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq);
@@ -3111,16 +3114,36 @@ static long calc_load_fold_active(struct rq *this_rq)
* When making the ILB scale, we should try to pull this in as well.
*/
static atomic_long_t calc_load_tasks_idle;
+static atomic_t calc_load_seq;
-static void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq)
+void calc_load_account_idle(void)
{
+ struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
long delta;
delta = calc_load_fold_active(this_rq);
+ this_rq->calc_load_inactive = delta;
+ this_rq->calc_load_seq = atomic_read(&calc_load_seq);
+
if (delta)
atomic_long_add(delta, &calc_load_tasks_idle);
}
+void calc_load_account_nonidle(void)
+{
+ struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
+
+ if (atomic_read(&calc_load_seq) == this_rq->calc_load_seq) {
+ atomic_long_sub(this_rq->calc_load_inactive, &calc_load_tasks_idle);
+ /*
+ * Undo the _fold_active() from _account_idle(). This
+ * avoids us loosing active tasks and creating a negative
+ * bias
+ */
+ this_rq->calc_load_active -= this_rq->calc_load_inactive;
+ }
+}
+
static long calc_load_fold_idle(void)
{
long delta = 0;
@@ -3128,16 +3151,13 @@ static long calc_load_fold_idle(void)
/*
* Its got a race, we don't care...
*/
+ atomic_inc(&calc_load_seq);
if (atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks_idle))
delta = atomic_long_xchg(&calc_load_tasks_idle, 0);
return delta;
}
#else
-static void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq)
-{
-}
-
static inline long calc_load_fold_idle(void)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched_idletask.c b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
index 9fa0f402..6ca191f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_idletask.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int fl
static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq)
{
schedstat_inc(rq, sched_goidle);
- calc_load_account_idle(rq);
return rq->idle;
}
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 3e216e0..808abd7 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
ts->tick_stopped = 1;
ts->idle_jiffies = last_jiffies;
rcu_enter_nohz();
+ calc_load_account_idle();
}
ts->idle_sleeps++;
@@ -520,6 +521,7 @@ void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(void)
ts->inidle = 0;
+ calc_load_account_nonidle();
rcu_exit_nohz();
/* Update jiffies first */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-20 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-29 7:01 High CPU load when machine is idle Damien Wyart
2010-10-14 14:58 ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) Damien Wyart
2010-10-14 15:29 ` Chase Douglas
2010-10-14 15:56 ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-15 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 13:27 ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-20 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-10-20 20:24 ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-21 1:48 ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21 1:53 ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-21 8:57 ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21 18:36 ` tmhikaru
2010-10-22 1:37 ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-21 17:18 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-22 21:03 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-22 23:03 ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-23 2:13 ` tmhikaru
2010-10-25 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-25 16:29 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-26 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-26 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 19:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-09 18:55 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-09 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-10 2:37 ` tmhikaru
2010-11-10 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-10 3:45 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-10 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-14 5:14 ` tmhikaru
2010-11-25 13:31 ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-25 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-27 20:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-28 4:26 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-28 11:40 ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-28 18:07 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-29 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 19:40 ` tmhikaru
2010-11-29 23:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 15:39 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-30 20:04 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-30 16:53 ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-30 17:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:27 ` tmhikaru
2010-12-02 10:16 ` tmhikaru
2010-12-08 20:40 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Cure more NO_HZ load average woes tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 20:01 ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) tmhikaru
2010-11-30 16:49 ` Damien Wyart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1287595605.3488.52.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
--cc=damien.wyart@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tmhikaru@gmail.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox