From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758258Ab0JZCRS (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:17:18 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:48634 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756403Ab0JZCRR (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:17:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=pBgy8achVIyMqnH9QMW76nn2JaNLNy+gmWYj46y3+jeE6yDfZ6eign/XDTcmgJRgiA o4uVk6Be8Z8OIh4laf4r+vP7kffzshRA0l3OcxSUP4uMlbkk/nBD5TCY0BF9vx8KssTd d6KgwxOELv6T9qrzIoMrl8SH26r24oF2nTJDg= Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/29] memstick: jmb38x_ms: rename functions From: Maxim Levitsky To: Alex Dubov Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML In-Reply-To: <896945.97413.qm@web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <896945.97413.qm@web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:17:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1288059431.4024.158.camel@maxim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 09:00 -0700, Alex Dubov wrote: > > --- On Fri, 22/10/10, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > From: Maxim Levitsky > > Subject: [PATCH 18/29] memstick: jmb38x_ms: rename functions > > To: "Alex Dubov" > > Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "LKML" , "Maxim Levitsky" > > Received: Friday, 22 October, 2010, 4:53 PM > > Give functions names that I hope will > > describe them better. > > Its a matter of personal taste somewhat, I admit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky > > --- > > Just like 2/3 of your patches in this pack, until now. And about 90% of patches that go to kernel no? Besides again, that was done to minimize diff, and I made _pio postfixes to make clear that functions are used for PIO. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky