From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760355Ab0JZUwQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:52:16 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:52731 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755211Ab0JZUwO (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:52:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=m1iEatVsLgBaOrbQtfqv//VDeMonrnnd1+jZ+dahnmIbKbDzWGFFmhH8UfBYNWbeS4 5ETOM8qBckvEHK5l2rGeM1e5j57XAEJxXC6nGZUySmtqHuPgaIQZGTKOOP37GS03cylJ cUnNMQPkCqvs4lBtscAywJDS1TQElDDZddUvM= Subject: Re: netns patches WAS( Re: [PATCH 8/8] net: Implement socketat. From: jamal Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Pavel Emelyanov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Containers , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Michael Kerrisk , Ulrich Drepper , Al Viro , David Miller , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Pavel Emelyanov , Ben Greear , Matt Helsley , Jonathan Corbet , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Jan Engelhardt , Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <1287145855.3642.30.camel@bigi> References: <4C9B162E.7040201@parallels.com> <1285240797.5036.5.camel@bigi> <4C9B3B06.900@parallels.com> <1285242055.5036.9.camel@bigi> <4C9B3F9C.8080506@parallels.com> <4CA7A07C.5030504@free.fr> <1286113441.3812.229.camel@bigi> <1287145855.3642.30.camel@bigi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:52:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1288126326.2094.131.camel@mojatatu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric, Ping? If you are too busy to push these in maybe have someone clueful like Daniel help out submitting? I think it should probably be reasonable to leave out the sockeat patch initially if it is deemed controversial.. cheers, jamal On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 08:30 -0400, jamal wrote: > Eric et al, > > Did these patches make it in? I was looking at > two Davem net trees and i dont see them. > > cheers, > jamal >