From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753523Ab0KEPZi (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:25:38 -0400 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:4308 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751948Ab0KEPZg (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:25:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/49] net/netfilter: Use vzalloc From: Joe Perches To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Eric Dumazet , Jesper Juhl , Patrick McHardy , "David S. Miller" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <7d6da34b7e84955795717b0241000a0701cd5b34.1288925425.git.joe@perches.com> <1288938640.3234.12.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1288940146.18440.55.camel@Joe-Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:25:34 -0700 Message-ID: <1288970734.18440.103.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 11:10 -0400, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Joe Perches wrote: > > I also think a single rolled-up single patch is good. > > I believe Jiri Kosina can easily apply all these individual patches as a > > single patch if he chooses. > I will, after this settles a little bit (the same for the WARN series). > I prefer waiting a bit before applying your patches usually. > First to see what lands in linux-next through maintainer's trees, second > to gather Acks. I think that's the right way to do these sorts of trivial changes too. Individual patches cc'd to maintainers for feedback, improvement, acks or to be directly applied to their trees, followed by a longish delay before any unapplied patches are taken up as a single patch by your trivial queue. Thanks for doing that work Jiri.