From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: markus@trippelsdorf.de, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hpa@linux.intel.com" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [bisected] Clocksource tsc unstable git
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:33:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289309637.2191.42.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101109125842.GA8636@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:58 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Does that make any sense or did I miss something obvious?
I'd write it as a PREEMPT_ACTIVE check, but yes I think you're right.
That said, I also have the below patch queued which should fix up the
wakeup-preemption.
---
Subject: sched: Fixup cross sched_class wakeup preemption
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Sun Oct 31 12:37:04 CET 2010
Instead of dealing with sched classes inside each check_preempt_curr()
implementation, pull out this logic into the generic wakeup preemption
path.
This fixes a hang in KVM (and others) where we are waiting for the
stop machine thread to run..
Tested-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1288891946.2039.31.camel@laptop>
---
kernel/sched.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
kernel/sched_fair.c | 6 ------
kernel/sched_stoptask.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -560,18 +560,8 @@ struct rq {
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
-static inline
-void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
-{
- rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags);
- /*
- * A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule. In
- * this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update.
- */
- if (test_tsk_need_resched(p))
- rq->skip_clock_update = 1;
-}
+static void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
static inline int cpu_of(struct rq *rq)
{
@@ -9402,4 +9392,30 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
+static void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
+{
+ const struct sched_class *class;
+
+ if (p->sched_class == rq->curr->sched_class) {
+ rq->curr->sched_class->check_preempt_curr(rq, p, flags);
+ } else {
+ for_each_class(class) {
+ if (class == rq->curr->sched_class)
+ break;
+ if (class == p->sched_class) {
+ resched_task(rq->curr);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule. In
+ * this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update.
+ */
+ if (test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
+ rq->skip_clock_update = 1;
+}
+
+
#endif /* #else #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1654,12 +1654,6 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr);
int scale = cfs_rq->nr_running >= sched_nr_latency;
- if (unlikely(rt_prio(p->prio)))
- goto preempt;
-
- if (unlikely(p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class))
- return;
-
if (unlikely(se == pse))
return;
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ select_task_rq_stop(struct rq *rq, struc
static void
check_preempt_curr_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
- resched_task(rq->curr); /* we preempt everything */
+ /* we're never preempted */
}
static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-26 11:20 Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -8589361717 ns) in current git Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-26 13:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-26 13:58 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-26 14:05 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-26 14:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-26 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-26 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-26 15:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-26 17:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-26 18:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-26 19:18 ` john stultz
2010-10-27 14:26 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-27 18:26 ` [bisected] Clocksource tsc unstable git markus
2010-10-27 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 19:42 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-27 19:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-09 12:58 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-11-09 13:07 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-11-09 13:21 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-11-09 13:28 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-11-09 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-09 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-10-29 8:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-29 8:30 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-29 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-29 11:34 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-29 11:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-29 11:54 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-10-29 13:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-29 12:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-29 17:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-29 17:26 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-11-01 18:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-01 18:45 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-11-02 15:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-05 16:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-11-05 16:42 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-11-05 17:45 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-11-05 21:27 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-11-05 21:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-11-09 14:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-11-09 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-11-17 23:21 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2010-11-24 11:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-29 17:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-27 3:24 ` Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -8589361717 ns) in current git Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289309637.2191.42.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox