From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753906Ab0KIQ4z (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:56:55 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:40842 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752134Ab0KIQ4t convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:56:49 -0500 Subject: Re: Q: perf_event && event->owner From: Peter Zijlstra To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Alan Stern , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Prasad , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20101109155714.GA1903@redhat.com> References: <20101108145647.GA3426@redhat.com> <20101108145754.GB3434@redhat.com> <20101108201108.GA6777@nowhere> <20101109155714.GA1903@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:56:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1289321804.2191.57.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 16:57 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > If the creator of perf_event dies, nobody can use its ->perf_event_list > anyway. What is the point to keep the reference to the dead task_struct > and preserve this ->perf_event_list? But when the owner dies it will close all its fds, which means it will clear its tsk->perf_event_list, no? (With exception of the case where the fd was passed through a unix-socket to another process).