From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: randrianasulu@gmail.com, Lin Ming <lin@ming.vg>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.37-rc1 build failure
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:59:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289393974.2191.115.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101103213439.01d2062d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:34 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> The build fails for me with the given .config file.
> It's due to selects and depends, finally comes down to HAVE_PERF_EVENTS not being
> enabled for M386 or M486. Do you actually have a processor of that vintage?
FWIW this .config generates a _TON_ of Kconfig dep warnings..
Urgh, Kconfig hell.
config PERF_EVENTS
bool "Kernel performance events and counters"
default y if (PROFILING || PERF_COUNTERS)
depends on HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
select ANON_INODES
select IRQ_WORK
# grep PERF_EVENTS borken-build/.config
CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y
CONFIG_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI=y
So we managed to get PERF_EVENTS=y even though its dependency
HAVE_PERF_EVENTS=n.
I bet that's because of:
config X86
select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS if (!M386 && !M486)
select PERF_EVENTS
Ingo, should we simply do something like the below patch?
---
Subject: x86: Remove M[34]86 conditional on HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
x86 requires PERF_EVENTS because of the hardware breakpoint mess,
so don't make it conditional on M[34]86.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index e832768..e330da2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ config X86
select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
select HAVE_IDE
select HAVE_OPROFILE
- select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS if (!M386 && !M486)
+ select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
select HAVE_IRQ_WORK
select HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
select HAVE_KPROBES
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-03 5:32 2.6.37-rc1 build failure randrianasulu
2010-11-03 2:05 ` Lin Ming
2010-11-04 3:34 ` randrianasulu
2010-11-04 4:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-11-04 12:16 ` randrianasulu
2010-11-10 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-11-10 13:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-10 17:12 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289393974.2191.115.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=lin@ming.vg \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=randrianasulu@gmail.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox