From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756241Ab0KJOo1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:44:27 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:43451 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755874Ab0KJOo0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:44:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC/Requirements/Design] h/w error reporting From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , "Luck, Tony" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mchehab@redhat.com, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Arjan van de Ven , Mathieu Desnoyers In-Reply-To: <1289400056.12418.139.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <4cd9edd7543527b78@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com> <20101110101450.GA18481@elte.hu> <1289400056.12418.139.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:43:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1289400234.2191.129.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 09:40 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > The second option was agreed upon by myself, Thomas, Frederic, and > Peter, and it was OK'd by Linus. > > What do you think about it? I would still like to see lots more detail before we commit to anything, sure the second way is the only way out, but you still need to come up with a trace data format and a control ABI. Without those its pretty pointless to even talk about stuff.