From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu,
acme@redhat.com, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Add support for extra parameters for raw events
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:59:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289505587.2084.193.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101111194936.GJ18718@basil.fritz.box>
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 20:49 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I think it would have parsed OK, but it is a confusing syntax to
> > look at. I should point out that there are also the u,k,h modifiers
> > which can be specified, even on raw events, so the full syntax looks
> > something like:
> >
> > -e rXXXX[+YYYY][:u|:k|:h]
>
> Ok I can fix the help text for that.
If we're frobbing it in the existing config qword, do we still need
special syntax?
Also, I think we can use the same mechanism to program the
PEBS-load-latency MSR, right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-11 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-11 16:15 [PATCH 1/3] perf-events: Add support for supplementary event registers Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 16:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf: Add support for extra parameters for raw events Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 17:54 ` Corey Ashford
2010-11-11 18:39 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 19:38 ` Corey Ashford
2010-11-11 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 19:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-11-11 20:12 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 20:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-12 10:27 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-12 10:49 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-12 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-12 13:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-12 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-12 14:03 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-12 13:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-12 15:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-12 10:41 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-12 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-12 10:39 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-12 10:48 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-12 10:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-12 10:56 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-11 16:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf-events: Fix LLC-* events on Intel Nehalem/Westmere Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 17:35 ` [PATCH/FIX] perf-events: Put the per cpu state for intel_pmu too Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 17:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-11 18:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 21:29 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-11-11 18:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf-events: Add support for supplementary event registers Stephane Eranian
2010-11-11 18:42 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 19:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-11 19:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-11 19:45 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-11 19:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289505587.2084.193.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox