From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755929Ab0KMKcn (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 05:32:43 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:41133 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752298Ab0KMKcm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 05:32:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf-events: Add support for supplementary event registers v2 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Andi Kleen Cc: eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com, Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: <20101113101148.GB6418@gargoyle.fritz.box> References: <1289580941-29744-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1289582630.2084.331.camel@laptop> <20101113101148.GB6418@gargoyle.fritz.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:32:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1289644367.2084.526.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 11:13 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Hrmm,. this doesn't really scale right wrt multiple extra_regs. > > > > You made the extra_regs thing fairly extensible, but the above doesn't > > really work well if there's multiple extra regs (say OFFCORE and > > LBR_CONFIG -- possibly even the two OFFCORE regs present on westmere). > > > > It basically needs a per-core state for each extra_reg possible. > > It shouldn't be too hard to extend it to use a table. I didn't want > to do that for the first iteration. I guess it could be done as followons > once LBR is implemented. Isn't it also relevant for the two offcore regs for wsm?