From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934294Ab0KPLtw (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:49:52 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:33508 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933791Ab0KPLtu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:49:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 0/2] Lockless memory allocator and list From: Peter Zijlstra To: Huang Ying Cc: Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Mauro Carvalho Chehab In-Reply-To: <1289868791-16658-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> References: <1289868791-16658-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:49:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1289908158.2109.568.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 08:53 +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > Hi, Len, > > This patchset is needed by APEI support. Which involves some lockless > operations. And I think they can be used by some other part of kernel > too. The whole notion of allocating memory from NMI context seems incredibly offensive. And then there's the whole point of not merging stuff without a user.