Re: trivial: make comment about vs{n,cn,}printf more understandable

[Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 842 bytes --]

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 at about 16:12:45 -0000, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> 
> "You probably want ... instead." sounds like a recommendation better
> not to use the v... functions.
> 

Which is true, if you dont' have a va_list its hard to get them.
But I do get your point.

>   * the @buf not including the trailing '\0'. If @size is <= 0 the function
>   * returns 0.
>   *
> - * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list.
> - * You probably want scnprintf() instead.
> + * If you're not already dealing with a va_list better use scnprintf().

That doesn't flow off my (mid-western usa) tounge.

How about
 * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list.
 * Otherwise you probably want to use scnprintf().

Alternatively,
 * If you're not already dealing with a va_list consider scnprintf().

Thanks,
milton