From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [thiscpuops upgrade 10/10] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:26:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290619610.2072.500.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011241013240.14268@router.home>
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:14 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > This thing still relies on disabling IRQs in the slow path, which means
> > its still going to be a lot of work to make it work on -rt.
>
> The disabling of irqs is because slab operations are used from interrupt
> context. If we can avoid slab operations from interrupt contexts then we
> can drop the interrupt disable in the slab allocators.
That's not so much the point, there's per-cpu assumptions due to that.
Not everything is under a proper lock, see for example this bit:
new = new_slab(s, gfpflags, node);
if (gfpflags & __GFP_WAIT)
local_irq_disable();
if (new) {
c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
stat(s, ALLOC_SLAB);
if (c->page)
flush_slab(s, c);
slab_lock(new);
__SetPageSlubFrozen(new);
c->page = new;
goto load_freelist;
}
There we have the __this_cpu_ptr, c->page deref and flush_slab()->stat()
call all before we take a lock.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-24 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-23 23:51 [thiscpuops upgrade 00/10] Upgrade of this_cpu_ops Christoph Lameter
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 01/10] percpucounter: Optimize __percpu_counter_add a bit through the use of this_cpu() options Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 7:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-26 15:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 02/10] vmstat: Optimize zone counter modifications through the use of this cpu operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 03/10] percpu: Generic support for this_cpu_add,sub,dec,inc_return Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 16:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:39 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 04/10] x86: Support " Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 05/10] x86: Use this_cpu_inc_return for nmi counter Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 17:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 17:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 06/10] vmstat: Use this_cpu_inc_return for vm statistics Christoph Lameter
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 07/10] highmem: Use this_cpu_xx_return() operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 08/10] percpu: generic this_cpu_cmpxchg() and this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 16:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-26 16:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 17:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-26 17:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 17:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 09/10] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and this_cpu_cmpxchg_double operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 0:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-24 3:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 7:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-24 0:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 10/10] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 0:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-24 3:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 4:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 1:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 1:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 3:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 7:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-24 16:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 16:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-24 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 16:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-24 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 19:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-24 19:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 20:01 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-24 19:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-24 16:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-11-24 18:08 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290619610.2072.500.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox