From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751441Ab0KYIAR (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:00:17 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:46174 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750981Ab0KYIAP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 03:00:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv3] perf tools: add event grouping capability to "perf stat" From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Corey Ashford , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Stephane Eranian , Julia Lawall , Tom Zanussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming In-Reply-To: <20101125074629.GC2538@nowhere> References: <1290650053-3486-1-git-send-email-cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1290666760.2072.539.camel@laptop> <20101125074629.GC2538@nowhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:00:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1290672009.2072.558.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 08:46 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > perf record -e task-clock:freq=1000,cycles:period=0 > > Wouldn't this syntax clash with the flags we have on events already? > > the u,k,p flags? >>From stephane's email (to which you were CC'ed) http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/23/303 > $ perf record -e cycles:u:period=100000,instructions:k:freq=1500 -a -- sleep 5 The parser isn't particularly pretty, maybe its time to think about a parser generator?