From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752564Ab0KYKsa (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 05:48:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:62187 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752223Ab0KYKs1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 05:48:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Call snd_soc_unregister_dais instead of snd_soc_unregister_dai in sh4_soc_dai_remove From: Liam Girdwood To: Axel Lin Cc: linux-kernel , Manuel Lauss , Mark Brown , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org In-Reply-To: <1290677035.1928.3.camel@mola> References: <1290677035.1928.3.camel@mola> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:48:23 +0000 Message-ID: <1290682103.3302.16.camel@odin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 17:23 +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > We call snd_soc_register_dais() in sh4_soc_dai_probe(), > thus we should call snd_soc_unregister_dais() in sh4_soc_dai_remove(). > > Otherwise, we got "too many arguments to function 'snd_soc_unregister_dai'" > error message. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > --- > sound/soc/sh/ssi.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c > index 40bbdf1..05192d9 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c > +++ b/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c > @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int __devinit sh4_soc_dai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > static int __devexit sh4_soc_dai_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - snd_soc_unregister_dai(&pdev->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(sh4_ssi_dai)); > + snd_soc_unregister_dais(&pdev->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(sh4_ssi_dai)); > return 0; > } > Acked-by: Liam Girdwood -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk