From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754786Ab0KZNGm (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:06:42 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:35870 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752341Ab0KZNGl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:06:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [rfc 1/3] perf, x86: P4 PMU - describe config format From: Peter Zijlstra To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Stephane Eranian , Ingo Molnar , LKML , ming.m.lin@intel.com In-Reply-To: References: <20101123224601.766827604@openvz.org> <20101123224800.294919307@openvz.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:06:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1290776807.2145.144.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:04 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > if none therad is active, single any > thread is active, both threads are active and finally any thread is > active (which is exactly 0b11 in single thread machine). i know it's > weird ;) > BTW, does P4 mandate SYS_CAP_ADMIN for counting another thread's events?