public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: tmhikaru@gmail.com
Cc: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Subject: Re: High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:59:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291129145.32004.874.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291071677.32004.527.camel@laptop>

On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 00:01 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> Ok, that's good testing.. so its still not quite the same as NO_HZ=n,
> how about this one?
> 
> (it seems to drop down to 0.00 if I wait a few minutes with top -d5)

OK, so here's a less crufty patch that gets the same result on my
machine, load drops down to 0.00 after a while.

It seems a bit slower to reach 0.00, but that could be because I
actually changed the load computation for NO_HZ=n as well, I added a
rounding factor in calc_load(), we no longer truncate the division.

If people want to compare, simply remove the third line from
calc_load(): load += 1UL << (FSHIFT - 1), to restore the old behaviour.

---
 include/linux/sched.h |    2 +-
 kernel/sched.c        |  127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/timer.c        |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index de4d68f..a6e0c62 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ extern unsigned long nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu);
 extern unsigned long this_cpu_load(void);
 
 
-extern void calc_global_load(void);
+extern void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks);
 
 extern unsigned long get_parent_ip(unsigned long addr);
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 864040c..7868a18 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2978,6 +2978,15 @@ static long calc_load_fold_active(struct rq *this_rq)
 	return delta;
 }
 
+static unsigned long
+calc_load(unsigned long load, unsigned long exp, unsigned long active)
+{
+	load *= exp;
+	load += active * (FIXED_1 - exp);
+	load += 1UL << (FSHIFT - 1);
+	return load >> FSHIFT;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
 /*
  * For NO_HZ we delay the active fold to the next LOAD_FREQ update.
@@ -3007,6 +3016,105 @@ static long calc_load_fold_idle(void)
 
 	return delta;
 }
+
+/**
+ * fixed_power_int - compute: x^n, in O(log n) time
+ *
+ * @x:         base of the power
+ * @frac_bits: fractional bits of @x
+ * @n:         power to raise @x to.
+ *
+ * By exploiting the relation between the definition of the natural power
+ * function: x^n := x*x*...*x (x multiplied by itself for n times), and
+ * the binary encoding of numbers used by computers: n := \Sum n_i * 2^i, 
+ * (where: n_i \elem {0, 1}, the binary vector representing n),
+ * we find: x^n := x^(\Sum n_i * 2^i) := \Prod x^(n_i * 2^i), which is
+ * of course trivially computable in O(log_2 n), the length of our binary
+ * vector.
+ */
+static unsigned long 
+fixed_power_int(unsigned long x, unsigned int frac_bits, unsigned int n)
+{
+	unsigned long result = 1UL << frac_bits;
+
+	if (n) for (;;) {
+		if (n & 1) {
+			result *= x;
+			result += 1UL << (frac_bits - 1);
+			result >>= frac_bits;
+		}
+		n >>= 1;
+		if (!n)
+			break;
+		x *= x;
+		x += 1UL << (frac_bits - 1);
+		x >>= frac_bits;
+	}
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+/*
+ * a1 = a0 * e + a * (1 - e)
+ *
+ * a2 = a1 * e + a * (1 - e)
+ *    = (a0 * e + a * (1 - e)) * e + a * (1 - e)
+ *    = a0 * e^2 + a * (1 - e) * (1 + e)
+ *
+ * a3 = a2 * e + a * (1 - e)
+ *    = (a0 * e^2 + a * (1 - e) * (1 + e)) * e + a * (1 - e)
+ *    = a0 * e^3 + a * (1 - e) * (1 + e + e^2)
+ *
+ *  ...
+ *
+ * an = a0 * e^n + a * (1 - e) * (1 + e + ... + e^n-1) [1]
+ *    = a0 * e^n + a * (1 - e) * (1 - e^n)/(1 - e)
+ *    = a0 * e^n + a * (1 - e^n)
+ *
+ * [1] application of the geometric series:
+ *
+ *              n         1 - x^(n+1)
+ *     S_n := \Sum x^i = -------------
+ *             i=0          1 - x
+ */
+static unsigned long
+calc_load_n(unsigned long load, unsigned long exp, 
+	    unsigned long active, unsigned int n)
+{
+
+	return calc_load(load, fixed_power_int(exp, FSHIFT, n), active);
+}
+
+static void calc_global_nohz(unsigned long ticks)
+{
+	long delta, active, n;
+
+	if (time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * If we crossed a calc_load_update boundary, make sure to fold
+	 * any pending idle changes, the respective CPUs might have
+	 * missed the tick driven calc_load_account_active() update
+	 * due to NO_HZ
+	 */
+	delta = calc_load_fold_idle();
+	if (delta)
+		atomic_long_add(delta, &calc_load_tasks);
+
+	if (ticks >= LOAD_FREQ) {
+		n = ticks / LOAD_FREQ;
+
+		active = atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks);
+		active = active > 0 ? active * FIXED_1 : 0;
+
+		avenrun[0] = calc_load_n(avenrun[0], EXP_1, active, n);
+		avenrun[1] = calc_load_n(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active, n);
+		avenrun[2] = calc_load_n(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active, n);
+
+		calc_load_update += n * LOAD_FREQ;
+	}
+}
 #else
 static void calc_load_account_idle(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
@@ -3016,6 +3124,10 @@ static inline long calc_load_fold_idle(void)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static void calc_global_nohz(unsigned long ticks)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
 /**
@@ -3033,24 +3145,17 @@ void get_avenrun(unsigned long *loads, unsigned long offset, int shift)
 	loads[2] = (avenrun[2] + offset) << shift;
 }
 
-static unsigned long
-calc_load(unsigned long load, unsigned long exp, unsigned long active)
-{
-	load *= exp;
-	load += active * (FIXED_1 - exp);
-	return load >> FSHIFT;
-}
-
 /*
  * calc_load - update the avenrun load estimates 10 ticks after the
  * CPUs have updated calc_load_tasks.
  */
-void calc_global_load(void)
+void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks)
 {
-	unsigned long upd = calc_load_update + 10;
 	long active;
 
-	if (time_before(jiffies, upd))
+	calc_global_nohz(ticks);
+
+	if (time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10))
 		return;
 
 	active = atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks);
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index d6ccb90..9f82b2a 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ void do_timer(unsigned long ticks)
 {
 	jiffies_64 += ticks;
 	update_wall_time();
-	calc_global_load();
+	calc_global_load(ticks);
 }
 
 #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_ALARM


  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-30 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-29  7:01 High CPU load when machine is idle Damien Wyart
2010-10-14 14:58 ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) Damien Wyart
2010-10-14 15:29   ` Chase Douglas
2010-10-14 15:56     ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-15 11:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 12:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 13:27   ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-20 13:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 13:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 14:14         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 14:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 17:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 20:24             ` Damien Wyart
2010-10-21  1:48             ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21  1:53               ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21  8:22                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-21  8:57                   ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21 18:36               ` tmhikaru
2010-10-22  1:37                 ` tmhikaru
2010-10-21 12:09             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-21 17:18               ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-22 21:03                 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-22 23:03                 ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-23  2:13                   ` tmhikaru
2010-10-25 10:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-25 16:29                     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-10-26 12:44                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-26 14:05                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 19:42                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-09 18:55                           ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-09 19:02                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-10  2:37                               ` tmhikaru
2010-11-10 12:01                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-10  3:45                               ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-10 12:00                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-14  5:14                                   ` tmhikaru
2010-11-25 13:31                                     ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-25 14:03                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-27 20:15                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-28  4:26                                           ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-28 11:40                                           ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-28 18:07                                             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-29 11:38                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 19:40                                               ` tmhikaru
2010-11-29 23:01                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 14:59                                                   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-11-30 15:39                                                     ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-30 20:04                                                       ` Kyle McMartin
2010-11-30 16:53                                                     ` Damien Wyart
2010-11-30 17:29                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:27                                                     ` tmhikaru
2010-12-02 10:16                                                       ` tmhikaru
2010-12-08 20:40                                                     ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Cure more NO_HZ load average woes tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 20:01                                                   ` High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later) tmhikaru
2010-11-30 16:49                                               ` Damien Wyart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1291129145.32004.874.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
    --cc=damien.wyart@free.fr \
    --cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tmhikaru@gmail.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox