From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752469Ab0LHLNl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:13:41 -0500
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:47923 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750960Ab0LHLNj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:13:39 -0500
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 2/3] nohz: fix printk_needs_cpu() return value
 on offline cpus
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
        Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>,
        Horst Hartmann <horsth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20101208080749.GB2523@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
References: <20101126120057.879397696@de.ibm.com>
	 <20101126120235.406766476@de.ibm.com> <1290773512.2145.139.camel@laptop>
	 <20101207213241.GL14849@kroah.com>
	 <20101208080749.GB2523@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:13:30 +0100
Message-ID: <1291806810.28378.2.camel@laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:07 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:32:41PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 01:11:52PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 13:00 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > > plain text document attachment (002_printk_needs_cpu.diff)
> > > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch fixes a hang observed with 2.6.32 kernels where timers got
> > > > enqueued on offline cpus.
> [...]
> > 
> > Is this going to make it into .37, or is it going to wait until .38?
> 
> I hope it will go into .37. The same should be true for the
> get_next_timer_interrupt() which addresses the same problem.
> Peter, Ingo?

Ingo just send the pull request to Linus for two of the three patches,
I'll try and feed him the last one today.