public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2 v2] tracing: Only trace sched_wakeup if it actually work something up
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:12:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291810330.28378.6.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101203040822.473086528@goodmis.org>

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 23:04 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Currently the tracepoint sched_wakeup traces the wakeup event even
> if the wakeup failed to wake anything up. This is quite stupid
> but it happens because we did not want to add a conditional
> to the core kernel code that would just slow down the wakeup events.
> 
Its actually quite useful at times, so no, I don't much like this.



  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-08 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-03  4:03 [RFC][PATCH 0/2 v2] tracing: Add conditional to tracepoints Steven Rostedt
2010-12-03  4:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] tracing: Add TRACE_EVENT_CONDITIONAL() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-03  4:54   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-03 14:09     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-03 15:27       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-03 15:38         ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-03 15:46           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-03  4:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2 v2] tracing: Only trace sched_wakeup if it actually work something up Steven Rostedt
2010-12-08 12:12   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-08 14:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-08 14:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-03 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2 v2] tracing: Add conditional to tracepoints Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-03 14:53   ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-03 14:59     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1291810330.28378.6.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox