From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: Consistently select LEDS Kconfig options
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:51:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292431897-13770-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
Currently the x86 platform devices are not consistent about selecting
or depending on the LEDs Kconfig variables, and this inconsistency
leads to Kconfig getting upset and refusing to offer LEDs (even on
non-x86 platforms):
drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig:422:error: recursive dependency detected!
drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig:422: symbol EEEPC_WMI depends on ACPI_WMI
drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig:438: symbol ACPI_WMI is selected by ACER_WMI
drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig:18: symbol ACER_WMI depends on LEDS_CLASS
drivers/leds/Kconfig:10: symbol LEDS_CLASS is selected by EEEPC_WMI
Fix this by always selecting rather than depending on the symbols as
slightly more drivers use this approach already and it seems more
user friendly.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
index 4c7f8b9..fa18c25 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ if X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES
config ACER_WMI
tristate "Acer WMI Laptop Extras"
depends on ACPI
- depends on LEDS_CLASS
- depends on NEW_LEDS
+ select LEDS_CLASS
+ select NEW_LEDS
depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
depends on SERIO_I8042
depends on RFKILL || RFKILL = n
@@ -513,8 +513,8 @@ config TOPSTAR_LAPTOP
config ACPI_TOSHIBA
tristate "Toshiba Laptop Extras"
depends on ACPI
- depends on LEDS_CLASS
- depends on NEW_LEDS
+ select LEDS_CLASS
+ select NEW_LEDS
depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
depends on INPUT
depends on RFKILL || RFKILL = n
--
1.7.1
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-15 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-15 16:51 Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-10 14:37 [PATCH] platform/x86: Consistently select LEDS Kconfig options Mark Brown
2011-01-10 16:55 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292431897-13770-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox