public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Reduce ttwu rq->lock contention
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:41:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292611264.2266.344.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292610297.2266.334.camel@twins>

On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 19:24 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Even simpler. This can race with, say, __migrate_task() which does
> > deactivate_task + activate_task and temporary clears on_rq. Although
> > this is simple to fix, I think.
> 
> Yes, another hole.. 

__migrate_task() is a tad special in that it should only migrate
runnable tasks, but of course we can have it preempted with ->state !=
TASK_RUNNING, which makes life interesting, but we can fix that by
including a PREEMPT_ACTIVE test in ttwu.

Other such callers are more straight fwd though:

  rt_mutex_setprio()
  set_user_nice()
  sched_move_task()
  __sched_setscheduler()
  normalize_task()

none of those are fast-path operations, so it is quite doable to also
take the ->pi_lock there and fully serialize them.
  

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-16 14:56 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched: Always provide p->oncpu Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18  1:03   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mutex: Use p->oncpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 17:34   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 19:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:17       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched: Change the ttwu success details Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:23   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:45         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 15:35       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-18  1:05   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18  1:09   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 14:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched: Reduce ttwu rq->lock contention Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 15:31   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-16 17:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-16 18:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 19:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17  3:06             ` Yan, Zheng
2010-12-17 13:23               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 16:54             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:43               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 19:28                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 21:02                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-18 14:49                   ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-18 20:08                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-19 11:20                       ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-17 18:21                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 17:50               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-17 18:24                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-17 18:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-16 19:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Reduce runqueue lock contention -v2 Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36   ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:39     ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 20:45         ` Frank Rowand
2010-12-16 19:36   ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292611264.2266.344.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox