Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes

Kevin Shanahan
2009-01-18T10:04:22Z

On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 11:21 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> If the host load is low enough, it may be worthwhile to repeat with
> -no-kvm. It's significantly different from kvm (much higher cpu load,
> and less tasks involved), but if the problem recurs, we know it's a pure
> sched issue.

Okay, I'll see how I go with this tonight.

Regards,
Kevin.