Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes

Ingo Molnar
2008-05-08T15:41:54Z

* Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:

> Can we get that verified and the description updated before it hits
> Linus' tree?

that's not needed. Mike's fix is correct, regardless of whether it fixes
the other regression or not.

> Otherwise this "could be related" will become unchangable metadata
> that will stay forever - no matter whether there's any relation at
> all.

... and the problem with that is exactly what?

Ingo