From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, hpa@zytor.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET percpu#this_cpu_ops] add this_cpu_{add_return|[cmp]xchg}() operations
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:53:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292860415.4434.1.camel@jaguar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292685852-12469-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 16:24 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here are the patches that I applied to percpu#this_cpu_ops branch.
> This branch won't be rebased and contains only the commits which
> implement the new this_cpu_* ops, so that it can be pulled into other
> trees without patches which make use of the operations which modify
> other subsystems.
>
> Christoph, I rearranged things a bit to make it conform better to the
> overall organization. It would be great if you can go over it once
> just in case.
>
> There are two git branches.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu.git this_cpu_ops
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu.git for-2.6.38
>
> Both branches won't be rebased. this_cpu_ops contains only patches
> from this series. for-2.6.38 contains other percpu changes mostly
> composed of patches which apply this_cpu_*() ops.
Thanks. Christoph, mind sending me the slub patches? There's been so
many I've lost track which one is the latest.
Pekka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-20 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-18 15:24 [PATCHSET percpu#this_cpu_ops] add this_cpu_{add_return|[cmp]xchg}() operations Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] percpu: Generic support for this_cpu_add, sub, dec, inc_return Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: Support " Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 15:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] percpu,x86: relocate this_cpu_add_return() and friends Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 15:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] percpu: Generic this_cpu_cmpxchg() and this_cpu_xchg support Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 15:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and this_cpu_xchg operations Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 15:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics Tejun Heo
2010-12-20 15:53 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292860415.4434.1.camel@jaguar \
--to=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox