From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753319Ab0LVNVb (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:21:31 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:34286 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751863Ab0LVNVa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:21:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] tracing: Only trace sched_wakeup if it actually work something up From: Peter Zijlstra To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, srostedt@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1293023945.2170.121.camel@laptop> References: <1293023945.2170.121.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:21:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1293024095.2170.123.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 14:19 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 13:16 +0000, tip-bot for Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Commit-ID: 14bc7a06c6175cfa8070a5f5022210b648c3e0a7 > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/14bc7a06c6175cfa8070a5f5022210b648c3e0a7 > > Author: Steven Rostedt > > AuthorDate: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:56:14 -0500 > > Committer: Steven Rostedt > > CommitDate: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:46:59 -0500 > > > > tracing: Only trace sched_wakeup if it actually work something up > > > > Currently the tracepoint sched_wakeup traces the wakeup event even > > if the wakeup failed to wake anything up. This is quite stupid > > but it happens because we did not want to add a conditional > > to the core kernel code that would just slow down the wakeup events. > > > > This patch changes the wakeup tracepoints to use the > > > > DEFINE_EVENT_CONDITIONAL() > > > > to test the "success" parameter and will only trace the event if > > the wakeup was successfull. > > > > The success field in the tracepoint is removed since it is no > > longer needed. > > I NAKed this, its stupid. And wrong too, I got a patch that makes success:=true, I also got a patch removing success entirely but people started wanking that their proglets rely on having it :/ Ideally I'd commit the removal and let whatever breaks break.