public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	robert.richter@amd.com
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] perf: Optimise topology iteration
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:38:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1293464287.2695.106.camel@localhost> (raw)

Currently we iterate the full machine looking for a matching core_id/nb
for the percore and the amd northbridge stuff , using a smaller topology
mask makes sense. 

Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c   |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index 67e2202..5a3b7b8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 	nb_id = amd_get_nb_id(cpu);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(nb_id == BAD_APICID);
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+	for_each_cpu(i, topology_core_cpumask(cpu)) {
 		nb = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, i).amd_nb;
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!nb))
 			continue;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 354d1de..ad70c2c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 	if (!ht_enabled(cpu))
 		return;
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+	for_each_cpu(i, topology_thread_cpumask(cpu)) {
 		struct intel_percore *pc = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, i).per_core;
 
 		if (pc && pc->core_id == core_id) {
-- 
1.7.3






             reply	other threads:[~2010-12-27 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-27 15:38 Lin Ming [this message]
2011-01-03 11:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf: Optimise topology iteration Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-03 15:20   ` Andi Kleen
2011-01-04  7:13     ` Lin Ming
2011-01-04  6:18   ` Lin Ming
2011-01-04 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 14:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-01-05  5:24     ` Lin Ming
2011-01-05  9:51       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1293464287.2695.106.camel@localhost \
    --to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox