public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kay.sievers@vrfy.org, hch@infradead.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/16] block: don't implicitly trigger event check on disk_unblock_events()
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:28:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1293557352-10592-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293557352-10592-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Currently, disk_unblock_events() implicitly kick event check if the
block count reaches zero.  This behavior is not described in the
comment and hinders with future changes.  Make the unblocker
explicitly check events by calling disk_check_events() as necessary.

This patch doesn't cause any behavior difference.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
---
 block/genhd.c  |    2 +-
 fs/block_dev.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index 5465a82..a1d41dc 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ void disk_block_events(struct gendisk *disk)
 void disk_unblock_events(struct gendisk *disk)
 {
 	if (disk->ev)
-		__disk_unblock_events(disk, true);
+		__disk_unblock_events(disk, false);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 6017389..c620628 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1377,6 +1377,7 @@ int blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
 			bd_unlink_disk_holder(bdev);
 			if (bdev->bd_write_holder) {
 				disk_unblock_events(bdev->bd_disk);
+				disk_check_events(bdev->bd_disk);
 				bdev->bd_write_holder = false;
 			} else
 				disk_check_events(bdev->bd_disk);
-- 
1.7.1


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-28 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-28 17:28 [PATCHSET] block: convert block drivers to ->check_events() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-12-28 17:28 ` [PATCH 02/16] block: don't check events on close unless it was blocked Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:28 ` [PATCH 03/16] block: don't check events while open is in progress Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 04/16] ide: convert to bdops->check_events() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 19:01   ` David Miller
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 05/16] floppy,{ami|ata}flop: " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 13:07   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 06/16] gdrom,viocd: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 07/16] paride: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 08/16] dac960: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 09/16] swim[3]: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 10/16] ub: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-29 15:53   ` Pete Zaitcev
2010-12-29 16:02     ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 11/16] xsysace: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-29  6:37   ` Grant Likely
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 12/16] i2o_block: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 13/16] s390/tape_block: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 14/16] umem: drop dummy ->media_changed() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 15/16] pktcdvd: convert to bdops->check_events() Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 17:29 ` [PATCH 16/16] staging: " Tejun Heo
2010-12-28 18:39   ` Greg KH
2010-12-28 20:04 ` [PATCHSET] block: convert block drivers to ->check_events() Jeff Garzik
2011-01-25 13:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 10:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-05 10:40     ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-07  8:08       ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-09  9:13 [PATCHSET] block: Convert block drivers to ->check_events(), take#2 Tejun Heo
2011-03-09  9:13 ` [PATCH 01/16] block: Don't implicitly trigger event check on disk_unblock_events() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1293557352-10592-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox